New Coalition research finds most funders do not systematically track or report proCHW investments, making it challenging to assess global funding flows.
Improved reporting can help optimize investments in proCHW programs and advance global health goals.
Why does this matter?
BETTER DATA MEANS BETTER DECISION-MAKING.
Most funders do not disaggregate CHW spending by occupational group type (e.g., volunteer vs. salaried), limiting the ability to track investments aligned with the World Health Organisation’s Guideline on CHW Programs. Due to this, coordination between governments, donors, and partners suffers. And funding gaps and duplication remain hidden.
In contrast, when CHW funding is visible and disaggregated, donors and governments can align efforts more effectively. So, funding can target the greatest needs, and progress toward global health goals and health for all becomes easier to track.
Visibility isn’t just about reporting—it’s about maximizing the impact of every dollar.




