THE CASE AGAINST ENTREPRENEURSHIP

IN THE BUSINESS OF SAVING LIVES

Entrepreneurial models of community healthcare turn health workers into sales associates, and communities into customers.

These models shift the cost of health programs onto the world’s poorest and most marginalized. And they are significantly less effective than programs that pay community health workers (CHWs) a stable salary.

The “big idea” is that alongside providing basic health education and services, CHWs are paid commission from selling health products door-to-door. Many programs also offer small performance-based cash incentives for certain tasks — such as data collection to satisfy donor-reporting priorities. These perverse incentives warp service delivery by distracting CHWs away from important but less financially rewarding responsibilities, while destabilizing their own financial security.

Two Community Health Workers with backpacks and one with a baby on her back
Suna West – CHW household visit and CHC meeting and dialogue with the community members

User Fees Create Barriers to Care. 

The user fees CHWs are forced to charge for medicines and other essentials represent a huge burden for struggling low-income families. At the same time the revenue they recoup for multimillion dollar health programs is negligible. Many families are faced with the choice of going without or being driven further into poverty. Aware of these difficulties, many CHWs refuse to push these products on their neighbors and as a result visit the most in need less often. The true cost of this model is children’s lives. When Burkina Faso abolished health care fees for children under five it saw a 74% reduction in child mortality.

CHWs should be able to focus on their heroic work providing quality healthcare and saving lives, not boosting product sales to secure their income.

 

STEPS TOWARD BETTER CARE MODELS

  • Retire sales-based CHW models as a strategy for sustainability. They restrict access and underperform.
  • Align with WHO guidelines for CHW remuneration and support.
    This means salaries, supervision, training, and integration – not commissions.
  • Partner with governments early and often. Sustainability comes from domestic financing and national ownership, not unit sales.
  • Listen to CHWs. They are experts in their own work. Their feedback helped reveal the weaknesses of the entrepreneurial model–and their insights should shape what comes next.

The entrepreneurial CHW model promises financial sustainability and empowerment. Instead, it creates barriers to care, distorts CHW priorities, and underperforms relative to professional CHW programs. The evidence is now overwhelming: salaried, professional CHW models are more effective, equitable, and aligned with the mission of health for all.

For social innovators committed to health equity, the path forward is not to transform CHWs into micro-entrepreneurs. It is to build and strengthen the systems that allow them to do what communities value most: provide care without conditions.

Community Health Worker riding a bicycle
Village Reach